International Energy Agency’s Green Energy Fantasy Is A Hoot
Looking for laughs? The International Energy Agency has produced a laugh-filled report, grandly titled: “Net Zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy system“. Redesigning the global energy system. My, oh my. Below are a few highlights, out of many.
To begin with, it is not a roadmap, as it does not tell us how to get there. In fact, you cannot get there from here, which makes their there very amusing. This is perhaps the most elaborate net-zero fantasy concocted so far.
IEA Executive Director Faith Birol explains where the fantasy comes from: “…combining for the first time the complex models of our two flagship series, the World Energy Outlook and Energy Technology Perspectives.”
So two, not just one, complex computer models, that have never before been combined. I feel better already. Instead of the world energy outlook, it is IEA’s outlook for world energy. I hope they are not predicting this because there is zero chance of it happening.
Since it is loaded with fantastical technologies, you might think this is at least a technology assessment, but it is not, for two reasons.
First of all, there is a heavy emphasis on what they call “behavioral changes.” When the technocrats start talking about behavioral changes it is time to step back and shut the door, because it is something they know nothing about. So there is nothing about how these deep behavioral changes will be brought about, most likely including by force.
Second, a technology assessment looks at feasibility and cost. That is what “assessment” means. This non-roadmap never considers either. Instead they gleefully point out that 50% of the needed technology does not yet exist in working form. How it can possibly be fielded globally, in unbelievably massive amounts, in 9 to 29 years is not explained. It is simply assumed, which is hilarious. I say 9 years because they also claim that all of the technology we need between now and 2030 already exists. Another laugh.
The biggest laugh of all is probably their most fundamental assumption. They assume that total global energy use in 2050 will be 8% LESS than today. Yes, less. Mind you they assume 2 billion more people, with more developing countries emerging from poverty, more people getting more electricity, and so forth. But still some-magical-how they need considerably less energy than we do now.
Apparently, it is all due to that great green magic wand called energy efficiency. I do not see how people getting cars, home heat and cooling, endless appliances, etc., that they never had before can be overcome with efficiency, but then I am not a complex computer model.
One thing I do like is that they do not buy the 100% renewables fantasy. They only get 70%, mostly from solar. How that is possible given that the sun does not shine 70% of the time is fun. Apparently, they make a lot of hydrogen which is pumped all over the place or something. That is a separate fantasy.
Apparently, the other 30% of energy comes mostly from nuclear. I guess they did not get the memo that nuclear is forbidden in green fantasyland. Surely they could just make more hydrogen.
Of course, everything is electrified. That is where the pesky behavioral changes come in. Apparently, no one wants to drive a gasoline-powered car, or cook or heat with natural gas, etc., even in developing countries. Or maybe these unhappy choices are forced upon them. The complex computer models are silent on this potentially unpleasant forced-march scenario.
Also funny is the great long list of peer reviewers of this so-called study. Almost all are promoters of renewables. Almost none are from developing countries. Even fewer are from electric power utilities, which are supposed to power this low energy wonderland.
So in its way, this study is very useful. IEA shows us in glorious detail just how laughable the green energy dream really is.
This article was published on June 5, 2021 and is reproduced with permission from CFACT, The Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow.
As we move through 2023 and into the next election cycle, The Prickly Pear will resume Take Action recommendations and information.